China (People’s Republic of) vs Malta: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
China (People’s Republic of)
79.9
in 2019
Malta
80.83
in 2019
China (People’s Republic of) rank
63rd
Malta rank
60th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- China (People’s Republic of)
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 80.83 against 79.9 in China (People’s Republic of), a difference of 0.93.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 63rd and Malta ranks 60th of 190 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), China (People’s Republic of) or Malta?
- Malta, at 80.83 against 79.9 in China (People’s Republic of) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between China (People’s Republic of) and Malta?
- 0.93, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Malta?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do China (People’s Republic of) and Malta rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- China (People’s Republic of) ranks 63rd and Malta ranks 60th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.