Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Lebanon

Lebanon: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 34.17 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
34.17
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
160th
of 191 countries
All-time high
34.17
in 2014
All-time low
34.17
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Lebanon, 2014–2019

01020302014201620192014: 34.22015: 34.22016: 34.22017: 34.22018: 34.22019: 34.2

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Lebanon recorded 34.17 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Lebanon ranks 160th of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Lebanon, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Lebanon, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 34.17 —
2015 34.17 +0.0%
2016 34.17 +0.0%
2017 34.17 +0.0%
2018 34.17 +0.0%
2019 34.17 +0.0%

Lebanon compared with similar countries

  • Lebanon's 34.17 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 53.86, 63% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Lebanon's 34.17 is below the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is 53.86, 63% of the median. (23 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Lebanon

  1. 157 Afghanistan 37.5 compare
  2. 158 Comoros 36.22 compare
  3. 159 South Sudan 34.9 compare
  4. 161 Guinea 32.62 compare
  5. 162 Sierra Leone 31.58 compare
  6. 163 Syria 31.02 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Lebanon

All data for Lebanon →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Lebanon?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Lebanon was 34.17 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Lebanon?
The highest recorded value was 34.17 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Lebanon?
The lowest recorded value was 34.17 in 2014.
How does Lebanon rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Lebanon ranks 160th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Lebanon?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Lebanon data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Lebanon. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/lebanon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/lebanon/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Lebanon</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.