Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Guinea?

Over the last ten years it is up 34.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Guinea data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Guinea

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Guinea
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 32.62 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

32.62

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

159th

of 188 countries

All-time high

32.62

in 2018

All-time low

24.29

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Guinea, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Guinea recorded 32.62 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 34.3% over ten years.

Guinea ranks 159th of 188 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Guinea

156 Comoros 36.22 compare
157 South Sudan 34.9 compare
158 Lebanon 34.17 compare
160 Sierra Leone 31.58 compare
161 Syria 31.02 compare
162 Kenya 30.62 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Guinea

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.111 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Manure Management 9.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 3,544 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2242 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 415.93 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.37 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.56 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 24.94 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 3.05 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 16 (2050)

All data for Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Guinea?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Guinea was 32.62 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Guinea?: The highest recorded value was 32.62 in 2018.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Guinea?: The lowest recorded value was 24.29 in 2014.
How does Guinea rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Guinea ranks 159th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Guinea?: Over the last ten years it is up 34.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Guinea data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.