Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Guinea

Guinea: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 32.62 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)
32.62
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
161st
of 191 countries
All-time high
32.62
in 2018
All-time low
24.29
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Guinea, 2014–2019

01020302014201620192014: 24.32015: 24.32016: 24.32017: 24.32018: 32.62019: 32.6

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Guinea recorded 32.62 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 34.3% over ten years.

Guinea ranks 161st of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Guinea, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Guinea, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 24.29 —
2015 24.29 +0.0%
2016 24.29 +0.0%
2017 24.29 +0.0%
2018 32.62 +34.3%
2019 32.62 +0.0%

Guinea compared with similar countries

  • Guinea's 32.62 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is 53.86, 61% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Guinea's 32.62 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 50.73, 64% of the median. (48 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Guinea

  1. 158 Comoros 36.22 compare
  2. 159 South Sudan 34.9 compare
  3. 160 Lebanon 34.17 compare
  4. 162 Sierra Leone 31.58 compare
  5. 163 Syria 31.02 compare
  6. 164 Kenya 30.62 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Guinea

All data for Guinea →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Guinea?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Guinea was 32.62 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Guinea?
The highest recorded value was 32.62 in 2018.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Guinea?
The lowest recorded value was 24.29 in 2014.
How does Guinea rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Guinea ranks 161st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Guinea?
Over the last ten years it is up 34.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Guinea data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Guinea. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/guinea/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Guinea</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.