Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Comoros?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Comoros data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Comoros

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Comoros
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Comoros: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 36.22 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

36.22

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

156th

of 188 countries

All-time high

36.22

in 2014

All-time low

36.22

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Comoros, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Comoros is 36.22, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

That places Comoros 156th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Comoros

153 Central African Republic 40.89 compare
154 Solomon Islands 38.33 compare
155 Afghanistan 37.5 compare
157 South Sudan 34.9 compare
158 Lebanon 34.17 compare
159 Guinea 32.62 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Comoros

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 1.81 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 10.74 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0211 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0012 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0068 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2117 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 57.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 0.3222 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 56.09 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 5.6 (2050)

All data for Comoros →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Comoros?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Comoros was 36.22 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Comoros?: The highest recorded value was 36.22 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Comoros?: The lowest recorded value was 36.22 in 2014.
How does Comoros rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Comoros ranks 156th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Comoros?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Comoros data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.