Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 37.5 in 2019. β–² Rising

Latest (2019)
37.5
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
156th
of 190 countries
All-time high
37.5
in 2016
All-time low
29.17
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of, 2014–2019

0102030402014201620192014: 29.22015: 29.22016: 37.52017: 37.52018: 37.52019: 37.5

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of recorded 37.5 for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 28.6% over ten years.

Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 156th of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Countries ranked near Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of

  1. 153 Senegal 41.53 compare
  2. 154 Central African Republic 40.89 compare
  3. 155 Solomon Islands 38.33 compare
  4. 157 Comoros, Union of the 36.22 compare
  5. 158 South Sudan, Republic of 34.9 compare
  6. 159 Lebanon 34.17 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of

All data for Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of was 37.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of?
The highest recorded value was 37.5 in 2016.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of?
The lowest recorded value was 29.17 in 2014.
How does Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of ranks 156th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of?
Over the last ten years it is up 28.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of. Statizoid. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/afghanistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/afghanistan/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Afghanistan, Islamic Republic of</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.