Guinea vs Syrian Arab Republic: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Guinea
32.62
in 2019
Syrian Arab Republic
31.02
in 2019
Guinea rank
161st
Syrian Arab Republic rank
163rd
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Guinea
- Syrian Arab Republic
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 32.62 against 31.02 in Syrian Arab Republic, a difference of 1.6.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Syrian Arab Republic's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
Guinea ranks 161st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
Syrian Arab Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Guinea or Syrian Arab Republic?
- Guinea, at 32.62 against 31.02 in Syrian Arab Republic as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 1.6, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Guinea and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Guinea ranks 161st and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 163rd of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.