Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bolivia

Bolivia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 73.75 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
73.75
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
84th
of 191 countries
All-time high
73.75
in 2014
All-time low
73.75
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bolivia, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 73.82015: 73.82016: 73.82017: 73.82018: 73.82019: 73.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Bolivia stood at 73.75. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Bolivia 84th out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bolivia, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Bolivia, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 73.75 —
2015 73.75 +0.0%
2016 73.75 +0.0%
2017 73.75 +0.0%
2018 73.75 +0.0%
2019 73.75 +0.0%

Bolivia compared with similar countries

  • Bolivia's 73.75 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 53.86, 1.4× the median. (47 countries reporting)
  • Bolivia's 73.75 is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 55, 1.3× the median. (33 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Bolivia

  1. 81 Saint Kitts and Nevis 74.11 compare
  2. 82 South Korea 73.78 compare
  3. 83 Japan 73.76 compare
  4. 85 Fiji 73.35 compare
  5. 86 Gambia 72.86 compare
  6. 87 Tonga 72.5 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Bolivia

All data for Bolivia →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Bolivia?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Bolivia was 73.75 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Bolivia?
The highest recorded value was 73.75 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Bolivia?
The lowest recorded value was 73.75 in 2014.
How does Bolivia rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Bolivia ranks 84th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Bolivia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Bolivia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bolivia. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/bolivia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/bolivia/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Bolivia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.