Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Tonga?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Tonga data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Tonga

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Tonga
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Tonga: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 72.5 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

72.5

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

85th

of 188 countries

All-time high

72.5

in 2014

All-time low

72.5

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Tonga, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Tonga is 72.5, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

That places Tonga 85th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Tonga

82 Bolivia 73.75 compare
83 Fiji 73.35 compare
84 Gambia 72.86 compare
86 Cyprus 72.08 compare
87 Taiwan 71.63 compare
88 Seychelles 71.61 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Tonga

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0197 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 9.35 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0269 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0446 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.0799 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 28.31 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 21.17 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1068 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0092 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0105 (2050)

All data for Tonga →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Tonga?: Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Tonga was 72.5 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Tonga?: The highest recorded value was 72.5 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Tonga?: The lowest recorded value was 72.5 in 2014.
How does Tonga rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Tonga ranks 85th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Tonga?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Tonga data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.