Bolivia, Plurinational State of vs Gambia: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Bolivia, Plurinational State of
73.75
in 2019
Gambia
72.86
in 2019
Bolivia, Plurinational State of rank
84th
Gambia rank
86th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of
- Gambia
How they compare
Bolivia, Plurinational State of currently reports 73.75 against 72.86 in Gambia, a difference of 0.89.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Bolivia, Plurinational State of has been ahead every year.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 84th and Gambia ranks 86th of 191 countries.
Bolivia, Plurinational State of has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Bolivia, Plurinational State of or Gambia?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of, at 73.75 against 72.86 in Gambia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Gambia?
- 0.89, with Bolivia, Plurinational State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Gambia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Bolivia, Plurinational State of and Gambia rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Bolivia, Plurinational State of ranks 84th and Gambia ranks 86th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.