Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Japan

Japan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) was 73.76 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
73.76
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
83rd
of 191 countries
All-time high
75.07
in 2014
All-time low
73.76
in 2018
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Japan, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 75.12015: 75.12016: 75.12017: 75.12018: 73.82019: 73.8

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Japan is 73.76, measured in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of down 1.7% over ten years.

That places Japan 83rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Japan, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Japan, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 75.07 —
2015 75.07 +0.0%
2016 75.07 +0.0%
2017 75.07 +0.0%
2018 73.76 -1.7%
2019 73.76 +0.0%

Japan compared with similar countries

  • Japan's 73.76 is below the median for high income countries, which is 81.25, 91% of the median. (62 countries reporting)
  • Japan's 73.76 is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 70.98, 1.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Japan

  1. 80 Israel 74.44 compare
  2. 81 Saint Kitts and Nevis 74.11 compare
  3. 82 South Korea 73.78 compare
  4. 84 Bolivia 73.75 compare
  5. 85 Fiji 73.35 compare
  6. 86 Gambia 72.86 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Japan

All data for Japan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Japan?
Trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) in Japan was 73.76 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Japan?
The highest recorded value was 75.07 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) recorded in Japan?
The lowest recorded value was 73.76 in 2018.
How does Japan rank for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
Japan ranks 83rd out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) rising or falling in Japan?
Over the last ten years it is down 1.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Japan data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Japan. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-import-border-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/japan/">Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) in Japan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.