Afghanistan vs South Sudan: Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD)
Afghanistan
37.5
in 2019
South Sudan
34.9
in 2019
Afghanistan rank
157th
South Sudan rank
159th
Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) over time
- Afghanistan
- South Sudan
How they compare
Afghanistan currently reports 37.5 against 34.9 in South Sudan, a difference of 2.6.
That makes Afghanistan's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2014 it was South Sudan ahead.
Afghanistan ranks 157th and South Sudan ranks 159th of 191 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd), Afghanistan or South Sudan?
- Afghanistan, at 37.5 against 34.9 in South Sudan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd) between Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 2.6, with Afghanistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Afghanistan and South Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
- How do Afghanistan and South Sudan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to import: border compliance (usd)?
- Afghanistan ranks 157th and South Sudan ranks 159th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to import: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost for border compliance to import benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.