Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) in China

China: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) was 822.95 DB06-15 methodology in 2014. ▲ Rising

Latest (2014)
822.95 DB06-15 methodology
Change on year
down 1.8%
World rank
142nd
of 184 countries
All-time high
838.05 DB06-15 methodology
in 2013
All-time low
536.3 DB06-15 methodology
in 2007
Years of data
10
2005–2014

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) in China, 2005–2014

02004006008002005200920142005: 578.5 DB06-15 methodology2006: 556.6 DB06-15 methodology2007: 536.3 DB06-15 methodology2008: 587.9 DB06-15 methodology2009: 592.8 DB06-15 methodology2010: 596.3 DB06-15 methodology2011: 558.9 DB06-15 methodology2012: 601.4 DB06-15 methodology2013: 838.1 DB06-15 methodology2014: 823 DB06-15 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB06-15 methodology.

Analysis

In 2014, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) in China stood at 822.95 DB06-15 methodology.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 1.8% on the previous year and up 42.3% over ten years.

Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) in China peaked at 838.05 DB06-15 methodology in 2013 and was at its lowest, 536.3 DB06-15 methodology, in 2007.

That places China 142nd out of 184 countries with data for 2014, putting it in the bottom quarter.

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) in China, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology) in China, 2005 to 2014.
Year DB06-15 methodology Change
2005 578.47 DB06-15 methodology —
2006 556.6 DB06-15 methodology -3.8%
2007 536.3 DB06-15 methodology -3.6%
2008 587.87 DB06-15 methodology +9.6%
2009 592.76 DB06-15 methodology +0.8%
2010 596.3 DB06-15 methodology +0.6%
2011 558.94 DB06-15 methodology -6.3%
2012 601.43 DB06-15 methodology +7.6%
2013 838.05 DB06-15 methodology +39.3%
2014 822.95 DB06-15 methodology -1.8%

China compared with similar countries

  • China's 822.95 DB06-15 methodology is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1,300 DB06-15 methodology, 63% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • China's 822.95 DB06-15 methodology is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 755 DB06-15 methodology, 1.1× the median. (27 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 570.4 DB06-15 methodology 536.3 DB06-15 methodology 592.76 DB06-15 methodology 5
2010s 683.54 DB06-15 methodology 558.94 DB06-15 methodology 838.05 DB06-15 methodology 5

Countries ranked near China

  1. 139 Solomon Islands 840 DB06-15 methodology compare
  2. 140 Japan 829.25 DB06-15 methodology compare
  3. 141 Jordan 825 DB06-15 methodology compare
  4. 143 Bahrain 810 DB06-15 methodology compare
  5. 144 Saint Kitts and Nevis 805 DB06-15 methodology compare
  6. 144 Tunisia 805 DB06-15 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 184 places →

More reference data data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) in China?
Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) in China was 822.95 DB06-15 methodology in 2014, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 838.05 DB06-15 methodology in 2013.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 536.3 DB06-15 methodology in 2007.
How does China rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated)?
China ranks 142nd out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
Is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container deflated) rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is up 42.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) in China. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-us-per-container-deflated-db06-15-methodology/china/">Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container deflated) (DB06-15 methodology)
Unit
DB06-15 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
184 places, 1,819 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The cost to export records the cost associated with exporting a standardized cargo of goods by sea transport through 4 predefined stages: document preparation; customs clearance and inspections; inland transport and handling; and port and terminal handling. It is calculated in US dollars per container deflated. Cost measures the fees levied on the export of goods in a 20-foot container, in US dollars. All fees charged by government agencies and the private sector to a trader in the process of exporting and importing the goods are taken into account. These include but are not limited to costs for documents, administrative fees for customs clearance and inspections, customs broker fees, port-related charges and inland transport costs. Only official costs are recorded. The component indicator is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.