Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Tanzania
Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) was 85.19 in 2014. ▲ Rising
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Tanzania, 2005–2014
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
In 2014, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Tanzania stood at 85.19. That is the highest value across all 10 years on record.
The figure is up 3.2% on the previous year and up 19.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Tanzania peaked at 85.19 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 57.13, in 2006.
Tanzania ranks 79th of 184 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 71.54 | — |
| 2006 | 57.13 | -20.1% |
| 2007 | 59.73 | +4.5% |
| 2008 | 61.92 | +3.7% |
| 2009 | 66.24 | +7.0% |
| 2010 | 69.17 | +4.4% |
| 2011 | 71.95 | +4.0% |
| 2012 | 80.87 | +12.4% |
| 2013 | 82.54 | +2.1% |
| 2014 | 85.19 | +3.2% |
Tanzania compared with similar countries
- Tanzania's 85.19 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 79.37, 1.1× the median. (46 countries reporting)
- Tanzania's 85.19 is above the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is 71.41, 1.2× the median. (46 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.31 | 57.13 | 71.54 | 5 |
| 2010s | 77.94 | 69.17 | 85.19 | 5 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
- 76 Yemen 85.73 compare
- 77 Lebanon 85.4 compare
- 78 Kuwait 85.29 compare
- 79 Antigua and Barbuda 85.19 compare
- 81 Mozambique 84.97 compare
- 82 Cape Verde 84.42 compare
- 82 Uruguay 84.42 compare
More reference data data for Tanzania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 59.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 72.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Tanzania?
- Trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) in Tanzania was 85.19 in 2014, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 85.19 in 2014.
- What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 57.13 in 2006.
- How does Tanzania rank for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Tanzania ranks 79th out of 184 countries with data for 2014.
- Is trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is up 19.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.