Mozambique vs Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15)
Mozambique
84.97
in 2014
Tanzania
85.19
in 2014
Mozambique rank
81st
Tanzania rank
79th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15) over time
- Mozambique
- Tanzania
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 85.19 against 84.97 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.22.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania ahead.
Mozambique ranks 81st and Tanzania ranks 79th of 183 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 70.96 | 63.31 | 7.64 | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 81.79 | 77.94 | 3.84 | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15), Mozambique or Tanzania?
- Tanzania, at 85.19 against 84.97 in Mozambique as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15) between Mozambique and Tanzania?
- 0.22, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tanzania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Mozambique and Tanzania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15)?
- Mozambique ranks 81st and Tanzania ranks 79th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.