Tanzania vs Uruguay: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
Tanzania
85.19
in 2014
Uruguay
84.42
in 2014
Tanzania rank
78th
Uruguay rank
81st
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- Tanzania
- Uruguay
How they compare
Tanzania currently reports 85.19 against 84.42 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.77.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Uruguay ahead.
Tanzania ranks 78th and Uruguay ranks 81st of 181 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tanzania | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.31 | 74.26 | 10.95 | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 77.94 | 80.59 | 2.64 | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Tanzania or Uruguay?
- Tanzania, at 85.19 against 84.42 in Uruguay as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Tanzania and Uruguay?
- 0.77, with Tanzania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tanzania and Uruguay?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do Tanzania and Uruguay rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- Tanzania ranks 78th and Uruguay ranks 81st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.