Kuwait vs Tanzania: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me

Kuwait
85.29
in 2014
Tanzania
85.19
in 2014
Kuwait rank
77th
Tanzania rank
78th

Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time

  • Kuwait
  • Tanzania
020406080200520092014

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 85.29 against 85.19 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.1.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania ahead.

Kuwait ranks 77th and Tanzania ranks 78th of 181 countries.

Kuwait has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 73.89 63.31 10.58 Kuwait
2010s 81.12 77.94 3.18 Kuwait

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, Kuwait or Tanzania?
Kuwait, at 85.29 against 85.19 in Tanzania as of 2014.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between Kuwait and Tanzania?
0.1, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Tanzania?
10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
How do Kuwait and Tanzania rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
Kuwait ranks 77th and Tanzania ranks 78th of 181 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
183 places, 1,813 data points, 2005–2014
Last refreshed

The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.