South Korea vs Taiwan: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
South Korea
94.34
in 2014
Taiwan
94.66
in 2014
South Korea rank
20th
Taiwan rank
17th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- South Korea
- Taiwan
How they compare
Taiwan currently reports 94.66 against 94.34 in South Korea, a difference of 0.32.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Taiwan ahead.
South Korea ranks 20th and Taiwan ranks 17th of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, South Korea averaged higher in 1 and Taiwan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Taiwan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.95 | 93.55 | 1.6 | Taiwan |
| 2010s | 94.77 | 94.68 | 0.0896 | South Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, South Korea or Taiwan?
- Taiwan, at 94.66 against 94.34 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between South Korea and Taiwan?
- 0.32, with Taiwan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Taiwan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Taiwan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- South Korea ranks 20th and Taiwan ranks 17th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.