South Korea vs Panama: Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me
South Korea
94.34
in 2014
Panama
94.44
in 2014
South Korea rank
20th
Panama rank
18th
Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 me over time
- South Korea
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 94.44 against 94.34 in South Korea, a difference of 0.1.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
South Korea ranks 20th and Panama ranks 18th of 181 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Korea | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 91.95 | 97.23 | 5.28 | Panama |
| 2010s | 94.77 | 95.83 | 1.06 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me, South Korea or Panama?
- Panama, at 94.44 against 94.34 in South Korea as of 2014.
- What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me between South Korea and Panama?
- 0.1, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Korea and Panama?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2014.
- How do South Korea and Panama rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export (us$ per container) (db06-15 me?
- South Korea ranks 20th and Panama ranks 18th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export (US$ per container) (DB06-15 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The score for the cost to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB06-15 studies.