Statizoid

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) was 80 in 2019. β–¬ Flat

Latest (2019)
80
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
90th
of 190 countries
All-time high
80
in 2014
All-time low
80
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 802015: 802016: 802017: 802018: 802019: 80

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines recorded 80 for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 90th of 190 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

  1. 87 Eswatini 81.11 compare
  2. 88 Fiji 81 compare
  3. 89 Guyana 80.56 compare
  4. 90 Benin 80 compare
  5. 90 Costa Rica 80 compare
  6. 90 Honduras 80 compare
  7. 90 State of Palestine 80 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places β†’

More reference data data for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines

All data for Saint Vincent and the Grenadines β†’

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines was 80 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
The highest recorded value was 80 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
The lowest recorded value was 80 in 2014.
How does Saint Vincent and the Grenadines rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
Saint Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 90th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Saint Vincent and the Grenadines data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV Β· JSON β€” 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.