Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Benin?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Benin data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Benin

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Benin
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Benin: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( was 80 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

89th

of 188 countries

All-time high

in 2014

All-time low

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( in Benin, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Benin is 80, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Benin 89th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Benin

86 Eswatini 81.11 compare
87 Fiji 81 compare
88 Guyana 80.56 compare
89 Costa Rica 80 compare
89 Honduras 80 compare
89 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 80 compare
89 Palestine 80 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Benin

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0882 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.8505 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.5244 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 8.56 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.71 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1979 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.67 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 2,839 (2050)

All data for Benin →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Benin?: Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( in Benin was 80 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Benin?: The highest recorded value was 80 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( recorded in Benin?: The lowest recorded value was 80 in 2014.
How does Benin rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?: Benin ranks 89th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( rising or falling in Benin?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Benin data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.