Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Palestine, State of

Palestine, State of: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) was 80 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
80
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
91st
of 191 countries
All-time high
80
in 2014
All-time low
80
in 2014
Years of data
6
2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Palestine, State of, 2014–2019

0204060802014201620192014: 802015: 802016: 802017: 802018: 802019: 80

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in Palestine, State of is 80, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Palestine, State of ranks 91st of 191 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Palestine, State of, year by year

Annual values for Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score in Palestine, State of, 2014 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2014 80
2015 80 +0.0%
2016 80 +0.0%
2017 80 +0.0%
2018 80 +0.0%
2019 80 +0.0%

Countries ranked near Palestine, State of

  1. 88 Eswatini 81.11 compare
  2. 89 Fiji 81 compare
  3. 90 Guyana 80.56 compare
  4. 91 Benin 80 compare
  5. 91 Costa Rica 80 compare
  6. 91 Honduras 80 compare
  7. 91 Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 80 compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for Palestine, State of

All data for Palestine, State of →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in Palestine, State of?
Trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) in Palestine, State of was 80 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Palestine, State of?
The highest recorded value was 80 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) recorded in Palestine, State of?
The lowest recorded value was 80 in 2014.
How does Palestine, State of rank for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd)?
Palestine, State of ranks 91st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) rising or falling in Palestine, State of?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Palestine, State of data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Palestine, State of. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/trading-across-borders-cost-to-export-documentary-compliance-usd-db16-20-methodology-score/west-bank-and-gaza/">Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) in Palestine, State of</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 1,145 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.