Benin vs Eswatini: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (

Benin
80
in 2019
Eswatini
81.11
in 2019
Benin rank
89th
Eswatini rank
86th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) ( over time

  • Benin
  • Eswatini
020406080201420162019

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 81.11 against 80 in Benin, a difference of 1.11.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Eswatini has been ahead every year.

Benin ranks 89th and Eswatini ranks 86th of 188 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (, Benin or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 81.11 against 80 in Benin as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) ( between Benin and Eswatini?
1.11, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Eswatini?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Benin and Eswatini rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: documentary compliance (usd) (?
Benin ranks 89th and Eswatini ranks 86th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Documentary compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for documentary compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.