Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Mali?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Mali data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Mali

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Mali
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Mali: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 77.2 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

77.2

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

69th

of 188 countries

All-time high

77.2

in 2014

All-time low

77.2

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Mali, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

Mali recorded 77.2 for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

That places Mali 69th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.

Countries ranked near Mali

66 Thailand 79 compare
67 Mongolia 78.76 compare
68 Nicaragua 77.36 compare
70 Malawi 77.08 compare
71 China 75.83 compare
72 Egypt 75.66 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Mali

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 11.03 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.79 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 580.67 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 30.22 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Burning - Crop residues 110.07 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 36.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.725 (2050)
Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 36.02 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 273.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 10,460 (2050)

All data for Mali →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Mali?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Mali was 77.2 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Mali?: The highest recorded value was 77.2 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Mali?: The lowest recorded value was 77.2 in 2014.
How does Mali rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Mali ranks 69th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Mali?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Mali data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.