How does Belarus rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?

Belarus ranks 29th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.

Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Belarus?

Over the last ten years it is up 4.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.

Where does this Belarus data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Belarus

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Belarus
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Belarus: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 93.87 in 2019. ▲ Rising

Latest (2019)

93.87

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

29th

of 188 countries

All-time high

93.87

in 2018

All-time low

89.84

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Belarus, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

In 2019, trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Belarus stood at 93.87. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 4.5% over ten years.

That places Belarus 29th out of 188 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Belarus

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Belarus

Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 756.48 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 4.18 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 21.39 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - IPCC Agriculture 6,429 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 1,107 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 518.87 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 3.52 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 5,669 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0133 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 487.54 (2050)

All data for Belarus →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Belarus?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Belarus was 93.87 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Belarus?: The highest recorded value was 93.87 in 2018.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Belarus?: The lowest recorded value was 89.84 in 2014.
How does Belarus rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Belarus ranks 29th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Belarus?: Over the last ten years it is up 4.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Belarus data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.