Belarus vs Bhutan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16

Belarus
93.87
in 2019
Bhutan
94.42
in 2019
Belarus rank
29th
Bhutan rank
28th

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 over time

  • Belarus
  • Bhutan
020406080100201420162019

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 94.42 against 93.87 in Belarus, a difference of 0.55.

Across all 6 years both countries report, Bhutan has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 29th and Bhutan ranks 28th of 188 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16, Belarus or Bhutan?
Bhutan, at 94.42 against 93.87 in Belarus as of 2019.
What is the difference in trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 between Belarus and Bhutan?
0.55, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Bhutan?
6 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2019.
How do Belarus and Bhutan rank globally for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?
Belarus ranks 29th and Bhutan ranks 28th of 188 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.