Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Bhutan?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Bhutan data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Bhutan

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Bhutan
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Bhutan: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 94.42 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

94.42

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

28th

of 188 countries

All-time high

94.42

in 2014

All-time low

94.42

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Bhutan, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Bhutan is 94.42, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.

Bhutan ranks 28th of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Bhutan

25 Bulgaria 94.81 compare
25 Sweden 94.81 compare
27 Lithuania 94.53 compare
29 Belarus 93.87 compare
29 Bolivia 93.87 compare
31 Bosnia and Herzegovina 93.4 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Bhutan

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1192 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0727 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5881 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1192 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop re 1.09 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Agricultural Soil 150.7 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 24.08 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure left on Pa 92.47 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure applied to 19.25 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 4.06 (2050)

All data for Bhutan →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Bhutan?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Bhutan was 94.42 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Bhutan?: The highest recorded value was 94.42 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Bhutan?: The lowest recorded value was 94.42 in 2014.
How does Bhutan rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Bhutan ranks 28th out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Bhutan?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Bhutan data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.