Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Ukraine?

Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.

Where does this Ukraine data come from?

The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Ukraine

Name: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Ukraine
Creator: World Bank
License: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)

Ukraine: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 was 92.92 in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)

92.92

Change on year

unchanged

World rank

32nd

of 188 countries

All-time high

92.92

in 2014

All-time low

92.92

in 2014

Years of data

2014–2019

Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16 in Ukraine, 2014–2019

Source: World Bank.

Analysis

The most recent figure for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Ukraine is 92.92, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 6 years on record.

The figure is unchanged over ten years.

Ukraine ranks 32nd of 188 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Countries ranked near Ukraine

29 Belarus 93.87 compare
29 Bolivia 93.87 compare
31 Bosnia and Herzegovina 93.4 compare
33 Moldova 92.82 compare
34 Montenegro 91.98 compare
35 Armenia 90.57 compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Ukraine

Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.72 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.8321 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 8.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.92 (2050)
Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 8.98 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 9.11 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 5.76 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 3.97 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 43.91 (2050)
Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 10.47 (2050)

All data for Ukraine →

Frequently asked questions

What is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Ukraine?: Trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 in Ukraine was 92.92 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Ukraine?: The highest recorded value was 92.92 in 2014.
What is the lowest trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 recorded in Ukraine?: The lowest recorded value was 92.92 in 2014.
How does Ukraine rank for trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16?: Ukraine ranks 32nd out of 188 countries with data for 2019.
Is trading across borders: cost to export: border compliance (usd) (db16 rising or falling in Ukraine?: Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Ukraine data come from?: The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 6 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

About this data

Indicator: Trading across borders: Cost to export: Border compliance (USD) (DB16-20 methodology) - Score
Source: World Bank
Licence: CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage: 190 places, 1,139 data points, 2014–2019
Last refreshed: 10 August 2026

The score for the cost for border compliance to export benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance, and is computed based on the methodology in the DB16-20 studies.