Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Jordan

Jordan: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 1.1 in 2025. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2025)
1.1
Change on year
up 55.6%
World rank
56th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.1
in 2025
All-time low
-1.17
in 1967
Years of data
104
1922–2025

Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Jordan, 1922–2025

-1-0.500.51192219732025

Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.

Analysis

Jordan recorded 1.1 for rigorous and impartial public administration score in 2025. That is the highest value across all 104 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 55.6% on the previous year and up 263.7% over ten years.

Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Jordan peaked at 1.1 in 2025 and was at its lowest, -1.17, in 1967.

That places Jordan 56th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Jordan, year by year

Annual values for Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Jordan, 1922 to 2025.
Year Value Change
1922 0.401
1923 0.401 +0.0%
1924 0.401 +0.0%
1925 0.401 +0.0%
1926 0.401 +0.0%
1927 0.401 +0.0%
1928 0.401 +0.0%
1929 0.401 +0.0%
1930 0.401 +0.0%
1931 0.401 +0.0%
1932 0.401 +0.0%
1933 0.401 +0.0%
1934 0.401 +0.0%
1935 0.401 +0.0%
1936 0.401 +0.0%
1937 0.401 +0.0%
1938 0.401 +0.0%
1939 0.401 +0.0%
1940 0.401 +0.0%
1941 0.401 +0.0%
1942 0.401 +0.0%
1943 0.401 +0.0%
1944 0.401 +0.0%
1945 0.401 +0.0%
1946 0.401 +0.0%
1947 0.401 +0.0%
1948 0.26 -35.2%
1949 0.26 +0.0%
1950 0.26 +0.0%
1951 0.26 +0.0%
1952 0.26 +0.0%
1953 0.26 +0.0%
1954 0.26 +0.0%
1955 0.26 +0.0%
1956 0.26 +0.0%
1957 0.26 +0.0%
1958 -1.16 -544.2%
1959 -1.16 -0.0%
1960 -1.16 -0.0%
1961 -1.16 -0.0%
1962 0.259 -122.4%
1963 0.259 +0.0%
1964 -0.164 -163.3%
1965 0.262 -259.8%
1966 0.262 +0.0%
1967 -1.17 -544.7%
1968 -1.17 -0.0%
1969 -1.17 -0.0%
1970 -0.567 -51.3%
1971 0.253 -144.6%
1972 -1.15 -553.8%
1973 -1.15 -0.0%
1974 -1.15 -0.0%
1975 -1.15 -0.0%
1976 -1.15 -0.0%
1977 -1.15 -0.0%
1978 -1.15 -0.0%
1979 -1.15 -0.0%
1980 -0.288 -74.9%
1981 -0.288 -0.0%
1982 -0.288 -0.0%
1983 -0.288 -0.0%
1984 -0.288 -0.0%
1985 -0.288 -0.0%
1986 -0.288 -0.0%
1987 -0.288 -0.0%
1988 -0.288 -0.0%
1989 -0.288 -0.0%
1990 -0.288 -0.0%
1991 -0.288 -0.0%
1992 -0.288 -0.0%
1993 -0.288 -0.0%
1994 -0.288 -0.0%
1995 -0.288 -0.0%
1996 -0.288 -0.0%
1997 -0.288 -0.0%
1998 -0.288 -0.0%
1999 -0.288 -0.0%
2000 -0.288 -0.0%
2001 -0.288 -0.0%
2002 -0.288 -0.0%
2003 -0.288 -0.0%
2004 -0.288 -0.0%
2005 -0.288 -0.0%
2006 -0.288 -0.0%
2007 -0.288 -0.0%
2008 -0.288 -0.0%
2009 -0.288 -0.0%
2010 0.108 -137.5%
2011 0.108 +0.0%
2012 0.108 +0.0%
2013 0.303 +180.6%
2014 0.303 +0.0%
2015 0.303 +0.0%
2016 0.303 +0.0%
2017 0.303 +0.0%
2018 0.303 +0.0%
2019 0.303 +0.0%
2020 0.303 +0.0%
2021 0.977 +222.4%
2022 0.977 +0.0%
2023 0.708 -27.5%
2024 0.708 +0.0%
2025 1.1 +55.6%

Jordan compared with similar countries

  • Jordan's 1.1 is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 0.0755, 14.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
  • Jordan's 1.1 is above the median for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan, which is -0.364. (23 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1920s 0.401 0.401 0.401 8
1930s 0.401 0.401 0.401 10
1940s 0.3728 0.26 0.401 10
1950s -0.023 -1.16 0.26 10
1960s -0.4927 -1.17 0.262 10
1970s -0.9498 -1.15 0.253 10
1980s -0.288 -0.288 -0.288 10
1990s -0.288 -0.288 -0.288 10
2000s -0.288 -0.288 -0.288 10
2010s 0.2445 0.108 0.303 10
2020s 0.7958 0.303 1.1 6

Countries ranked near Jordan

  1. 53 Greece 1.21 compare
  2. 54 South Africa 1.19 compare
  3. 55 Mauritius 1.14 compare
  4. 57 Portugal 1.1 compare
  5. 58 Malawi 1.06 compare
  6. 59 Lithuania 0.982 compare

See the full ranking of 176 places →

More reference data data for Jordan

All data for Jordan →

Frequently asked questions

What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Jordan?
Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Jordan was 1.1 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Jordan?
The highest recorded value was 1.1 in 2025.
What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Jordan?
The lowest recorded value was -1.17 in 1967.
How does Jordan rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
Jordan ranks 56th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Jordan?
Over the last ten years it is up 263.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Jordan data come from?
The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 104 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Jordan. Statizoid, drawing on V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/rigorous-and-impartial-public-administration-score/jordan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/rigorous-and-impartial-public-administration-score/jordan/">Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Jordan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 30,350 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.