Jordan vs Mauritius: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Jordan
1.1
in 2025
Mauritius
1.14
in 2025
Jordan rank
56th
Mauritius rank
55th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Jordan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 1.14 against 1.1 in Jordan, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 56th and Mauritius ranks 55th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 4 and Mauritius in 7.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.401 | -0.245 | 0.646 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.401 | -0.2255 | 0.6265 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.3728 | 0.1015 | 0.2713 | Jordan |
| 1950s | -0.023 | 1.75 | 1.77 | Mauritius |
| 1960s | -0.4927 | 1.98 | 2.48 | Mauritius |
| 1970s | -0.9498 | 1.62 | 2.57 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | -0.288 | 1.62 | 1.91 | Mauritius |
| 1990s | -0.288 | 1.62 | 1.91 | Mauritius |
| 2000s | -0.288 | 1.62 | 1.91 | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0.2445 | 0.9365 | 0.692 | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0.7958 | -0.373 | 1.17 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Jordan or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 1.14 against 1.1 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Jordan and Mauritius?
- 0.04, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mauritius?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Mauritius rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Jordan ranks 56th and Mauritius ranks 55th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.