Jordan vs Malawi: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score
Jordan
1.1
in 2025
Malawi
1.06
in 2025
Jordan rank
56th
Malawi rank
58th
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score over time
- Jordan
- Malawi
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 1.1 against 1.06 in Malawi, a difference of 0.04.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 56th and Malawi ranks 58th of 176 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 9 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0.401 | -2.8 | 3.2 | Jordan |
| 1930s | 0.401 | -2.8 | 3.2 | Jordan |
| 1940s | 0.3728 | -2.8 | 3.17 | Jordan |
| 1950s | -0.023 | -2.8 | 2.77 | Jordan |
| 1960s | -0.4927 | -1.47 | 0.9739 | Jordan |
| 1970s | -0.9498 | -0.666 | 0.2838 | Malawi |
| 1980s | -0.288 | -0.666 | 0.378 | Jordan |
| 1990s | -0.288 | -0.4934 | 0.2054 | Jordan |
| 2000s | -0.288 | -0.4272 | 0.1392 | Jordan |
| 2010s | 0.2445 | -0.079 | 0.3235 | Jordan |
| 2020s | 0.7958 | 1.11 | 0.3155 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher rigorous and impartial public administration score, Jordan or Malawi?
- Jordan, at 1.1 against 1.06 in Malawi as of 2025.
- What is the difference in rigorous and impartial public administration score between Jordan and Malawi?
- 0.04, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Malawi?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Malawi rank globally for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Jordan ranks 56th and Malawi ranks 58th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.