Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Lithuania
Lithuania: Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score was 0.982 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Latest (2025)
0.982
Change on year
down 24.7%
World rank
59th
of 176 countries
All-time high
1.75
in 2013
All-time low
-2.28
in 1950
Years of data
231
1795–2025
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Lithuania, 1795–2025
Source: V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
Analysis
In 2025, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Lithuania stood at 0.982.
That represents a change of down 24.7% on the previous year and down 44.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, rigorous and impartial public administration score in Lithuania peaked at 1.75 in 2013 and was at its lowest, -2.28, in 1950.
That places Lithuania 59th out of 176 countries with data for 2025, putting it in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score in Lithuania, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1795 | -1.87 | — |
| 1796 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1797 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1798 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1799 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1800 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1801 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1802 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1803 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1804 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1805 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1806 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1807 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1808 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1809 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1810 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1811 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1812 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1813 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1814 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1815 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1816 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1817 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1818 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1819 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1820 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1821 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1822 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1823 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1824 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1825 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1826 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1827 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1828 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1829 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1830 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1831 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1832 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1833 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1834 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1835 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1836 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1837 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1838 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1839 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1840 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1841 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1842 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1843 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1844 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1845 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1846 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1847 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1848 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1849 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1850 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1851 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1852 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1853 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1854 | -1.87 | -0.0% |
| 1855 | -0.582 | -68.8% |
| 1856 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1857 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1858 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1859 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1860 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1861 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1862 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1863 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1864 | -0.582 | -0.0% |
| 1865 | 0.377 | -164.8% |
| 1866 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1867 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1868 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1869 | 0.377 | +0.0% |
| 1870 | 1.39 | +269.0% |
| 1871 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1872 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1873 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1874 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1875 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1876 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1877 | 1.39 | +0.0% |
| 1878 | 0.383 | -72.5% |
| 1879 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1880 | 0.383 | +0.0% |
| 1881 | -0.308 | -180.4% |
| 1882 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1883 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1884 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1885 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1886 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1887 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1888 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1889 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1890 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1891 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1892 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1893 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1894 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1895 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1896 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1897 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1898 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1899 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1900 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1901 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1902 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1903 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1904 | -0.308 | -0.0% |
| 1905 | -0.448 | +45.5% |
| 1906 | -0.322 | -28.1% |
| 1907 | -0.246 | -23.6% |
| 1908 | -0.108 | -56.1% |
| 1909 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1910 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1911 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1912 | -0.108 | -0.0% |
| 1913 | -0.178 | +64.8% |
| 1914 | -0.178 | -0.0% |
| 1915 | -0.304 | +70.8% |
| 1916 | -0.304 | -0.0% |
| 1917 | -0.096 | -68.4% |
| 1918 | 0.272 | -383.3% |
| 1919 | 0.295 | +8.5% |
| 1920 | 0.801 | +171.5% |
| 1921 | 0.975 | +21.7% |
| 1922 | 1.01 | +3.7% |
| 1923 | 1.14 | +12.4% |
| 1924 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1925 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1926 | 0.8 | -29.6% |
| 1927 | 0.435 | -45.6% |
| 1928 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1929 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1930 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1931 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1932 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1933 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1934 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1935 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1936 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1937 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1938 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1939 | 0.435 | +0.0% |
| 1940 | -1.66 | -481.8% |
| 1941 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1942 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1943 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1944 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1945 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1946 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1947 | -1.66 | -0.0% |
| 1948 | -1.86 | +12.2% |
| 1949 | -1.86 | -0.0% |
| 1950 | -2.28 | +22.4% |
| 1951 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1952 | -2.28 | -0.0% |
| 1953 | -2.02 | -11.6% |
| 1954 | -1.36 | -32.5% |
| 1955 | -1.36 | -0.0% |
| 1956 | -1.21 | -11.3% |
| 1957 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1958 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1959 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1960 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1961 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1962 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1963 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1964 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1965 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1966 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1967 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1968 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1969 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1970 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1971 | -1.21 | -11.8% |
| 1972 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1973 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1974 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1975 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1976 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1977 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1978 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1979 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1980 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1981 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1982 | -1.21 | -0.0% |
| 1983 | -1.38 | +13.9% |
| 1984 | -1.38 | -0.0% |
| 1985 | -1.23 | -11.1% |
| 1986 | -1.27 | +3.5% |
| 1987 | -1.08 | -14.7% |
| 1988 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1989 | -1.08 | -0.0% |
| 1990 | 1.14 | -205.4% |
| 1991 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1992 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1993 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1994 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1995 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1996 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1997 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1998 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 1999 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 2000 | 1.14 | +0.0% |
| 2001 | 1.31 | +14.8% |
| 2002 | 1.31 | +0.0% |
| 2003 | 1.31 | +0.0% |
| 2004 | 1.29 | -1.4% |
| 2005 | 1.29 | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1.29 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1.29 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1.29 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1.29 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1.56 | +20.4% |
| 2011 | 1.56 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1.56 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1.75 | +12.7% |
| 2014 | 1.75 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 1.75 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 1.62 | -7.5% |
| 2017 | 1.62 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 1.62 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 1.62 | +0.0% |
| 2020 | 1.62 | +0.0% |
| 2021 | 1.3 | -19.6% |
| 2022 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 2023 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 2024 | 1.3 | +0.0% |
| 2025 | 0.982 | -24.7% |
Lithuania compared with similar countries
- Lithuania's 0.982 is below the median for high income countries, which is 1.58, 62% of the median. (55 countries reporting)
- Lithuania's 0.982 is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 1.15, 85% of the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1790s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 5 |
| 1800s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1810s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1820s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1830s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1840s | -1.87 | -1.87 | -1.87 | 10 |
| 1850s | -1.23 | -1.87 | -0.582 | 10 |
| 1860s | -0.1025 | -0.582 | 0.377 | 10 |
| 1870s | 1.19 | 0.383 | 1.39 | 10 |
| 1880s | -0.2389 | -0.308 | 0.383 | 10 |
| 1890s | -0.308 | -0.308 | -0.308 | 10 |
| 1900s | -0.2772 | -0.448 | -0.108 | 10 |
| 1910s | -0.0817 | -0.304 | 0.295 | 10 |
| 1920s | 0.83 | 0.435 | 1.14 | 10 |
| 1930s | 0.435 | 0.435 | 0.435 | 10 |
| 1940s | -1.7 | -1.86 | -1.66 | 10 |
| 1950s | -1.64 | -2.28 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1960s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1970s | -1.23 | -1.38 | -1.21 | 10 |
| 1980s | -1.22 | -1.38 | -1.08 | 10 |
| 1990s | 1.14 | 1.14 | 1.14 | 10 |
| 2000s | 1.28 | 1.14 | 1.31 | 10 |
| 2010s | 1.64 | 1.56 | 1.75 | 10 |
| 2020s | 1.3 | 0.982 | 1.62 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Lithuania
More reference data data for Lithuania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2893 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1106 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1208 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 1.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9699 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.6729 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5859 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 5.41 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.6578 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is rigorous and impartial public administration score in Lithuania?
- Rigorous and impartial public administration score in Lithuania was 0.982 in 2025, according to V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data.
- What is the highest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Lithuania?
- The highest recorded value was 1.75 in 2013.
- What is the lowest rigorous and impartial public administration score recorded in Lithuania?
- The lowest recorded value was -2.28 in 1950.
- How does Lithuania rank for rigorous and impartial public administration score?
- Lithuania ranks 59th out of 176 countries with data for 2025.
- Is rigorous and impartial public administration score rising or falling in Lithuania?
- Over the last ten years it is down 44.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Lithuania data come from?
- The figures come from V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Rigorous and Impartial Public Administration Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 231 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).
About this data
Central estimate of the extent to which public officials respect the law, and administer it without arbitrariness and bias.