Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in South Sudan
South Sudan: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in South Sudan, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in South Sudan is 2 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
The figure is up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in South Sudan peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2012 and was at its lowest, 1 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
South Sudan ranks 151st of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in South Sudan, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +100.0% |
| 2013 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 1.8 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 2 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near South Sudan
- 151 Bangladesh 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Nigeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Algeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Antigua and Barbuda 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Armenia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Costa Rica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Ecuador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Eritrea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Eswatini 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Ethiopia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Ghana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Guyana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Iran 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Lao People's Democratic Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Lebanon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Malaysia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Malta 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Myanmar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Namibia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Nicaragua 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 San Marino 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Saint Lucia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Syria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Palestine, State of 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 151 Yemen 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for South Sudan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 7.41 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 7.41 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 7 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.3667 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0368 (2019)
- Spring temperature anomalies -2.16 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month -0.2213 °C (2026)
- Summer temperature anomalies 2.51 °C (2026)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Crop Residues 53.11 (2019)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Manure left on Pasture 8,797 (2019)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in South Sudan?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in South Sudan was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in South Sudan?
- The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2012.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in South Sudan?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does South Sudan rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- South Sudan ranks 151st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in South Sudan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this South Sudan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.