Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Namibia

Namibia: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat

Latest (2019)
2 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
150th
of 190 countries
All-time high
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
All-time low
2 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Namibia, 2003–2019

00.511.522003201120192003: 2 DB15-20 methodology2004: 2 DB15-20 methodology2005: 2 DB15-20 methodology2006: 2 DB15-20 methodology2007: 2 DB15-20 methodology2008: 2 DB15-20 methodology2009: 2 DB15-20 methodology2010: 2 DB15-20 methodology2011: 2 DB15-20 methodology2012: 2 DB15-20 methodology2013: 2 DB15-20 methodology2014: 2 DB15-20 methodology2015: 2 DB15-20 methodology2016: 2 DB15-20 methodology2017: 2 DB15-20 methodology2018: 2 DB15-20 methodology2019: 2 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Namibia is 2 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Namibia peaked at 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 2 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

Namibia ranks 150th of 190 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 2 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near Namibia

  1. 150 Bangladesh 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 150 Nigeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 150 Algeria 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 150 Antigua and Barbuda 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 150 Armenia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 150 Costa Rica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 150 Dominica 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 150 Ecuador 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 150 Eritrea 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 150 Eswatini 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 150 Ethiopia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 150 Fiji 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 150 Ghana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 150 Guyana 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 150 Iran 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 150 Lao People’s Democratic Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 150 Lebanon 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 150 Malaysia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 150 Malta 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 150 Myanmar 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 150 Nicaragua 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 150 San Marino 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 150 South Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 150 Saint Lucia 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 150 Sudan 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 150 Syrian Arab Republic 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 150 Venezuela 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 150 Palestinian Authority or West Bank and Gaza Strip 2 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 150 Yemen 2 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 190 places →

More reference data data for Namibia

All data for Namibia →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Namibia?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Namibia was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Namibia?
The highest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Namibia?
The lowest recorded value was 2 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does Namibia rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
Namibia ranks 150th out of 190 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Namibia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
Where does this Namibia data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Namibia. Statizoid. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/namibia/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Namibia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
190 places, 3,230 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.