Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▬ Flat
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Puerto Rico, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Puerto Rico is 6 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Puerto Rico peaked at 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2003 and was at its lowest, 6 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Puerto Rico ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Puerto Rico, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2005 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2006 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Puerto Rico
- 1 China 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 United States of America 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Japan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Afghanistan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Albania 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bahrain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Belgium 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Denmark 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Finland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 France 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Germany 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Iceland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kosovo 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Liberia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Micronesia, Federated States of 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Montenegro 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Netherlands 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 North Macedonia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Romania 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Serbia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Slovenia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 South Africa 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Spain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Sweden 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Timor-Leste 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Uruguay 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Puerto Rico
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2501 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1709 (2050)
- Summer temperature anomalies 0.4659 °C (2026)
- Spring temperature anomalies 0.2752 °C (2026)
- Temperature anomalies by month 0.7164 °C (2026)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Enteric Fermentation 974.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Direct emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.7966 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) (AR5) - Crop Residues 0.0793 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Burning - Crop 0.0077 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0011 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Puerto Rico?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Puerto Rico was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The highest recorded value was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Puerto Rico?
- The lowest recorded value was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Puerto Rico rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Puerto Rico ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Puerto Rico?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Puerto Rico data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.