Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Micronesia, Federated States of
Micronesia, Federated States of: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ▲ Rising
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Micronesia, Federated States of, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
The most recent figure for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Micronesia, Federated States of is 6 DB15-20 methodology, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Micronesia, Federated States of peaked at 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2006 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 17 years of available data.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Micronesia, Federated States of, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2005 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2007 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 3.43 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Micronesia, Federated States of
- 1 China 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 United States of America 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Japan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Afghanistan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Albania 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bahrain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Belgium 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Denmark 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Finland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 France 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Germany 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Iceland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kosovo 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Liberia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Montenegro 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Netherlands 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 North Macedonia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Romania 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Serbia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Slovenia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 South Africa 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Spain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Sweden 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Timor-Leste 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Uruguay 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Micronesia, Federated States of
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0157 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Burning - Crop residues 0.0003 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - Enteric Fermentation 1.94 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.092 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0626 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0136 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0001 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CH4) - IPCC Agriculture 3.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Burning - Crop residues 0 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (CO2eq) from N2O (AR5) - Manure Management 3.61 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Micronesia, Federated States of was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Micronesia, Federated States of?
- The highest recorded value was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2006.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Micronesia, Federated States of?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Micronesia, Federated States of rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Micronesia, Federated States of ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in Micronesia, Federated States of?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Micronesia, Federated States of data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.