Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Afghanistan
Afghanistan: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Afghanistan, 2003–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.
Analysis
In 2019, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Afghanistan stood at 6 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.
Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Afghanistan peaked at 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2018 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.
Afghanistan ranks 1st of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Afghanistan, year by year
| Year | DB15-20 methodology | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2003 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2004 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2005 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2006 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2007 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2008 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2009 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2010 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2011 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2012 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2013 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2014 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2015 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2016 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2017 | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2018 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | — |
| 2019 | 6 DB15-20 methodology | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 7 |
| 2010s | 1.2 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | 6 DB15-20 methodology | 10 |
Countries ranked near Afghanistan
- 1 China 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 United States 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Japan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Albania 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Azerbaijan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bahrain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Belgium 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Denmark 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Finland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 France 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Germany 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Iceland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kazakhstan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kosovo 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Liberia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Micronesia (country) 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Montenegro 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Netherlands 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 North Macedonia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Poland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Puerto Rico 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Romania 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Serbia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Slovenia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 South Africa 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Spain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Sweden 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 East Timor 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Uruguay 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
- 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
More reference data data for Afghanistan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.8991 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 4.89 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 6.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.4362 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 6.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.01 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.847 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 18.65 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 26.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 2.38 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Afghanistan?
- Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in Afghanistan was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Afghanistan?
- The highest recorded value was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2018.
- What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in Afghanistan?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
- How does Afghanistan rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
- Afghanistan ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Afghanistan data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unsecured creditors during distribution of assets.