Statizoid

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China

China: Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
6 DB15-20 methodology
Change on year
up 20.0%
World rank
1st
of 191 countries
All-time high
6 DB15-20 methodology
in 2019
All-time low
0 DB15-20 methodology
in 2003
Years of data
17
2003–2019

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China, 2003–2019

02462003201120192003: 0 DB15-20 methodology2004: 0 DB15-20 methodology2005: 0 DB15-20 methodology2006: 0 DB15-20 methodology2007: 0 DB15-20 methodology2008: 5 DB15-20 methodology2009: 5 DB15-20 methodology2010: 5 DB15-20 methodology2011: 5 DB15-20 methodology2012: 5 DB15-20 methodology2013: 5 DB15-20 methodology2014: 5 DB15-20 methodology2015: 5 DB15-20 methodology2016: 5 DB15-20 methodology2017: 5 DB15-20 methodology2018: 5 DB15-20 methodology2019: 6 DB15-20 methodology

Source: World Bank. Measured in DB15-20 methodology.

Analysis

In 2019, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China stood at 6 DB15-20 methodology. That is the highest value across all 17 years on record.

That represents a change of up 20.0% on the previous year and up 20.0% over ten years.

Over the whole period, resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China peaked at 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0 DB15-20 methodology, in 2003.

That places China 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China, year by year

Year DB15-20 methodology Change
2003 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2004 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2005 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2006 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2007 0 DB15-20 methodology —
2008 5 DB15-20 methodology —
2009 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2010 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2011 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2012 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2013 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2014 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2015 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2016 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2017 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2018 5 DB15-20 methodology +0.0%
2019 6 DB15-20 methodology +20.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 1.43 DB15-20 methodology 0 DB15-20 methodology 5 DB15-20 methodology 7
2010s 5.1 DB15-20 methodology 5 DB15-20 methodology 6 DB15-20 methodology 10

Countries ranked near China

  1. 1 United States of America 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  2. 1 Japan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  3. 1 Afghanistan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  4. 1 Albania 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  5. 1 Azerbaijan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  6. 1 Bahrain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  7. 1 Belgium 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  8. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  9. 1 Denmark 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  10. 1 Finland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  11. 1 France 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  12. 1 Germany 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  13. 1 Iceland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  14. 1 Kazakhstan 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  15. 1 Kosovo 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  16. 1 Liberia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  17. 1 Micronesia, Federated States of 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  18. 1 Montenegro 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  19. 1 Netherlands 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  20. 1 North Macedonia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  21. 1 Poland 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  22. 1 Puerto Rico 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  23. 1 Romania 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  24. 1 Serbia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  25. 1 Slovenia 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  26. 1 South Africa 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  27. 1 Spain 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  28. 1 Sweden 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  29. 1 Timor-Leste 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  30. 1 United Arab Emirates 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  31. 1 Uruguay 6 DB15-20 methodology compare
  32. 1 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 6 DB15-20 methodology compare

See the full ranking of 191 places →

More reference data data for China

All data for China →

Frequently asked questions

What is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China?
Resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019, according to the World Bank.
What is the highest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in China?
The highest recorded value was 6 DB15-20 methodology in 2019.
What is the lowest resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) recorded in China?
The lowest recorded value was 0 DB15-20 methodology in 2003.
How does China rank for resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6)?
China ranks 1st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
Is resolving insolvency: management of debtor's assets index (0-6) rising or falling in China?
Over the last ten years it is up 20.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this China data come from?
The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 17 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/stat/resolving-insolvency-management-of-debtor-s-assets-index-0-6-db15-20-methodology/china/">Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) in China</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Resolving insolvency: Management of debtor's assets index (0-6) (DB15-20 methodology)
Unit
DB15-20 methodology
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
191 places, 3,247 data points, 2003–2019
Last refreshed

The management of debtor's assets index has six components: (i) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can continue performing contracts essential to the debtor’s survival; (ii) whether the debtor (or an insolvency representative on its behalf) can reject overly burdensome contracts; (iii) whether undervalued transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (iv) whether transactions entered into before commencement of insolvency proceedings that give preference to one or several creditors can be avoided after proceedings are initiated; (v) whether the insolvency framework includes specific provisions that allow the debtor (or an insolvency representa­tive on its behalf), after commencement of insolvency proceedings, to obtain financing necessary to function during the proceedings; and (vi) whether post-commencement finance receives priority over ordinary unse­cured creditors during distribution of assets.