Eritrea, The State of vs France: Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4)
Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) over time
- Eritrea, The State of
- France
How they compare
Eritrea, The State of currently reports 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in France, a difference of 0 DB15-20 methodology.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Eritrea, The State of ahead.
Eritrea, The State of ranks 86th and France ranks 86th of 190 countries.
Eritrea, The State of has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea, The State of | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0.1429 DB15-20 methodology | 0.8571 DB15-20 methodology | Eritrea, The State of |
| 2010s | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 1 DB15-20 methodology | 0 DB15-20 methodology | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4), Eritrea, The State of or France?
- Eritrea, The State of, at 1 DB15-20 methodology against 1 DB15-20 methodology in France as of 2019.
- What is the difference in resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4) between Eritrea, The State of and France?
- 0 DB15-20 methodology, with Eritrea, The State of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea, The State of and France?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do Eritrea, The State of and France rank globally for resolving insolvency: creditor participation index (0-4)?
- Eritrea, The State of ranks 86th and France ranks 86th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Resolving insolvency: Creditor participation index (0-4) (DB15-20 methodology). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The creditor participation index has four components: (i) whether creditors appoint the insolvency representative or approve, ratify or reject the appointment of the insolvency representative; (ii) Whether creditors are required to approve the sale of substantial assets of the debtor in the course of insolvency proceedings; (iii) Whether an individual creditor has the right to access financial information about the debtor during insolvency proceedings; and (iv) Whether an individual creditor can object to a decision of the court or of the insolvency representative to approve or reject claims against the debtor brought by the creditor itself and by other creditors.