Tuvalu vs Zambia: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time
- Tuvalu
- Zambia
How they compare
Tuvalu currently reports -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4207 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zambia, a difference of 0.0185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Tuvalu ahead.
Tuvalu ranks 127th and Zambia ranks 129th of 204 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tuvalu | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5552 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0396 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zambia |
| 2010s | -0.7691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4711 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.298 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zambia |
| 2020s | -0.5841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4937 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0904 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Tuvalu or Zambia?
- Tuvalu, at -0.4022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.4207 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Tuvalu and Zambia?
- 0.0185 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tuvalu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tuvalu and Zambia?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Tuvalu and Zambia rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Tuvalu ranks 127th and Zambia ranks 129th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.