Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan
Bhutan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Bhutan, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
The most recent figure for regulatory quality - governance estimate in Bhutan is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, measured in 2025.
The figure is up 17.8% on the previous year and up 76.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Bhutan peaked at 0.2158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003 and was at its lowest, -0.9325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2010.
Bhutan ranks 103rd of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.1842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.1668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -9.5% |
| 2000 | -0.1658 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6% |
| 2002 | -0.1439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -13.2% |
| 2003 | 0.2158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -249.9% |
| 2004 | -0.6591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -405.5% |
| 2005 | -0.1497 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -77.3% |
| 2006 | -0.5039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +236.6% |
| 2007 | -0.4912 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2008 | -0.586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +19.3% |
| 2009 | -0.9087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +55.1% |
| 2010 | -0.9325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +2.6% |
| 2011 | -0.9299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3% |
| 2012 | -0.905 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.7% |
| 2013 | -0.9195 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.6% |
| 2014 | -0.8102 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -11.9% |
| 2015 | -0.3942 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -51.3% |
| 2016 | -0.3543 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.1% |
| 2017 | -0.1298 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -63.4% |
| 2018 | -0.0497 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -61.7% |
| 2019 | -0.0685 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +37.8% |
| 2020 | -0.0341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -50.2% |
| 2021 | -0.0581 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +70.5% |
| 2022 | -0.1146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +97.3% |
| 2023 | -0.1145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
| 2024 | -0.1136 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.7% |
| 2025 | -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.8% |
Bhutan compared with similar countries
- Bhutan's -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6455 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 14% of the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Bhutan's -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is above the median for South Asia, which is -0.3504 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 27% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
Biggest year-on-year movements
Years where Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Bhutan changed far more than this series normally does. A large move can be a real event or a change in how the figure was measured — the source note below says who published it.
| Year | Change | From | To |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 | -405.5% | 0.2158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6591 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2003 | +249.9% | -0.1439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
| 2006 | -236.6% | -0.1497 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5039 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.1755 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1842 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1668 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.5493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0497 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1146 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Bhutan
More reference data data for Bhutan
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0217 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0671 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0167 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.1192 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0727 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0153 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3489 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.5881 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0909 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Bhutan?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Bhutan was -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2158 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2003.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Bhutan?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.9325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2010.
- How does Bhutan rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Bhutan ranks 103rd out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Bhutan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 76.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Bhutan data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.