Bhutan vs Samoa: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Bhutan
-0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Samoa
-0.0756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Bhutan rank
103rd
Samoa rank
100th

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Samoa
-1-0.75-0.5-0.2500.25199620102025

How they compare

Samoa currently reports -0.0756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Samoa ahead.

Bhutan ranks 103rd and Samoa ranks 100th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s -0.1755 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1066 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2821 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Samoa
2000s -0.377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4263 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Samoa
2010s -0.5493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5341 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Samoa
2020s -0.088 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1496 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0616 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Bhutan or Samoa?
Samoa, at -0.0756 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bhutan as of 2025.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Bhutan and Samoa?
0.0178 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Samoa?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Bhutan and Samoa rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Bhutan ranks 103rd and Samoa ranks 100th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Samoa: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bhutan/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bhutan/samoa/">Bhutan vs Samoa: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,391 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.