Bahamas vs Bhutan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate

Bahamas
-0.1073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bhutan
-0.0913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Bahamas rank
105th
Bhutan rank
102nd

Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate over time

  • Bahamas
  • Bhutan
-1-0.500.511.5199620102024

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports -0.0913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bahamas, a difference of 0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Bahamas ahead.

Bahamas ranks 105th and Bhutan ranks 102nd of 204 countries.

Bahamas has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bahamas Bhutan Difference Ahead
1990s 0.7649 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1657 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9306 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahamas
2000s 1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3571 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.5 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahamas
2010s 0.3204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5131 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8336 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahamas
2020s -0.0601 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.0772 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0171 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Bahamas

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher regulatory quality - governance estimate, Bahamas or Bhutan?
Bhutan, at -0.0913 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.1073 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Bahamas as of 2024.
What is the difference in regulatory quality - governance estimate between Bahamas and Bhutan?
0.016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Bhutan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Bahamas and Bhutan rank globally for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
Bahamas ranks 105th and Bhutan ranks 102nd of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bahamas vs Bhutan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bahamas-the/bhutan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/regulatory-quality-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/bahamas-the/bhutan/">Bahamas vs Bhutan: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,143 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.