Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in China
China: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ◆ Volatile
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in China, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in China stood at -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 13.5% on the previous year and up 28.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in China peaked at -0.0241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020 and was at its lowest, -0.6662 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 2002.
China ranks 104th of 206 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in China, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -0.3274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -0.4078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +24.6% |
| 2000 | -0.3166 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.4% |
| 2002 | -0.6662 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +110.4% |
| 2003 | -0.6164 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -7.5% |
| 2004 | -0.3698 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -40.0% |
| 2005 | -0.3022 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.3% |
| 2006 | -0.191 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -36.8% |
| 2007 | -0.1813 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.1% |
| 2008 | -0.1074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -40.8% |
| 2009 | -0.1691 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +57.5% |
| 2010 | -0.1486 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.2% |
| 2011 | -0.1225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -17.6% |
| 2012 | -0.2417 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +97.3% |
| 2013 | -0.2672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.6% |
| 2014 | -0.1466 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -45.1% |
| 2015 | -0.1539 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.9% |
| 2016 | -0.1252 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -18.6% |
| 2017 | -0.0648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -48.2% |
| 2018 | -0.0947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +46.1% |
| 2019 | -0.0734 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -22.5% |
| 2020 | -0.0241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -67.2% |
| 2021 | -0.0358 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +48.5% |
| 2022 | -0.1056 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +195.1% |
| 2023 | -0.1067 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.1% |
| 2024 | -0.0976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -8.6% |
| 2025 | -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +13.5% |
China compared with similar countries
- China's -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for upper middle income countries, which is -0.0934 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.2× the median. (59 countries reporting)
- China's -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is -0.0624 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.8× the median. (34 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.3676 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4078 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.3274 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -0.3244 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.6662 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1074 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -0.1439 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2672 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0648 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -0.0801 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near China
More reference data data for China
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 49.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 75.5 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 18.8 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 303.29 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 165.62 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 206.2 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 350.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1,480 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 102.37 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in China?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in China was -0.1108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in China?
- The highest recorded value was -0.0241 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2020.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in China?
- The lowest recorded value was -0.6662 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- How does China rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- China ranks 104th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in China?
- Over the last ten years it is up 28.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this China data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.