Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Congo
Congo: Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) was -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025. ▲ Rising
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate in Congo, 1996–2025
Source: The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Measured in approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
Analysis
In 2025, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Congo stood at -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That represents a change of up 0.1% on the previous year and down 16.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, regulatory quality - governance estimate in Congo peaked at -0.9518 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002 and was at its lowest, -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, in 1998.
Congo ranks 184th of 206 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 27 years of available data.
Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) in Congo, year by year
| Year | approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1996 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | — |
| 1998 | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.1% |
| 2000 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -16.1% |
| 2002 | -0.9518 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -29.6% |
| 2003 | -1.14 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +20.2% |
| 2004 | -1.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -12.0% |
| 2005 | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +23.1% |
| 2006 | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -6.9% |
| 2007 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.0% |
| 2008 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +5.1% |
| 2009 | -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +0.4% |
| 2010 | -1.18 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.5% |
| 2011 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +1.9% |
| 2012 | -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.3% |
| 2013 | -1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2014 | -1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.7% |
| 2015 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -5.4% |
| 2016 | -1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +7.6% |
| 2017 | -1.22 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +10.8% |
| 2018 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.8% |
| 2019 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +3.1% |
| 2020 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +8.0% |
| 2021 | -1.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -10.2% |
| 2022 | -1.27 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | +4.3% |
| 2023 | -1.23 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -2.5% |
| 2024 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -3.0% |
| 2025 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1% |
Congo compared with similar countries
- Congo's -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for lower middle income countries, which is -0.6455 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.9× the median. (47 countries reporting)
- Congo's -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 is below the median for Sub-Saharan Africa, which is -0.7299 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, 1.6× the median. (48 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -1.55 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.49 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 2 |
| 2000s | -1.15 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9518 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 9 |
| 2010s | -1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.25 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 10 |
| 2020s | -1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.35 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 6 |
Countries ranked near Congo
More reference data data for Congo
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0199 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1866 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.2108 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0031 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.2108 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0668 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0724 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.9126 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.017 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is regulatory quality - governance estimate in Congo?
- Regulatory quality - governance estimate in Congo was -1.2 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2025, according to The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG).
- What is the highest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Congo?
- The highest recorded value was -0.9518 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 2002.
- What is the lowest regulatory quality - governance estimate recorded in Congo?
- The lowest recorded value was -1.61 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in 1998.
- How does Congo rank for regulatory quality - governance estimate?
- Congo ranks 184th out of 206 countries with data for 2025.
- Is regulatory quality - governance estimate rising or falling in Congo?
- Over the last ten years it is down 16.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Congo data come from?
- The figures come from The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as part of Regulatory Quality - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 27 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Regulatory Quality (RQ) captures perceptions of the government’s ability to design and implement policies and regulations that promote private sector development. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.