Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Tanzania
Tanzania: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 2 0-10 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Tanzania, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
In 2019, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Tanzania stood at 2 0-10. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Tanzania peaked at 2 0-10 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2 0-10, in 2005.
Tanzania ranks 171st of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Tanzania, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Tanzania
- 171 Barbados 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Czechia 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Ecuador 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Eswatini 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Fiji 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Gambia 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Haiti 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Hungary 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Marshall Islands 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Qatar 2 0-10 compare
- 171 South Sudan 2 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Tanzania
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6405 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 11.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.7582 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 14.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 2.15 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.26 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 59.37 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 72.45 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 4.13 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Tanzania?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Tanzania was 2 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Tanzania?
- The highest recorded value was 2 0-10 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Tanzania?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Tanzania rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- Tanzania ranks 171st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index rising or falling in Tanzania?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Tanzania data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.