Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Czechia
Czechia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 2 0-10 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Czechia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
Czechia recorded 2 0-10 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Czechia peaked at 2 0-10 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 2 0-10, in 2005.
Czechia ranks 171st of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Czechia, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 2 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Czechia
- 171 Barbados 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Ecuador 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Eswatini 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Fiji 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Gambia 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Haiti 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Hungary 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Marshall Islands 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Qatar 2 0-10 compare
- 171 South Sudan 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Tanzania, United Republic of 2 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Czechia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.5039 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.1071 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.3319 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.08 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 1.69 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.11 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.5681 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 9.83 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 1.81 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Czechia?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Czechia was 2 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Czechia?
- The highest recorded value was 2 0-10 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Czechia?
- The lowest recorded value was 2 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Czechia rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- Czechia ranks 171st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index rising or falling in Czechia?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Czechia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.