Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Ecuador
Ecuador: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 2 0-10 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Ecuador, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 2 0-10 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is up 100.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Ecuador peaked at 2 0-10 in 2014 and was at its lowest, 1 0-10, in 2005.
Ecuador ranks 171st of 191 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 1 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 1 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 1 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 1 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 1 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 1 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 1 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 1 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 1 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 0-10 | +100.0% |
| 2015 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1 0-10 | 1 0-10 | 1 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 1.6 0-10 | 1 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 171 Barbados 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Czechia 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Eswatini 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Fiji 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Gambia 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Haiti 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Hungary 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Marshall Islands 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Qatar 2 0-10 compare
- 171 South Sudan 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Tanzania 2 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Ecuador
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.9379 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 2.51 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1826 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 4.74 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 3.14 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 1.18 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 13.63 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 23.57 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9943 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Ecuador?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Ecuador was 2 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 2 0-10 in 2014.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 1 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Ecuador rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- Ecuador ranks 171st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is up 100.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.