Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Eswatini
Eswatini: Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index was 2 0-10 in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Eswatini, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank. Measured in 0-10.
Analysis
Eswatini recorded 2 0-10 for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
That represents a change of unchanged over five years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Eswatini peaked at 2 0-10 in 2010 and was at its lowest, 0 0-10, in 2005.
That places Eswatini 171st out of 191 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index in Eswatini, year by year
| Year | 0-10 | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2006 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2007 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2008 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2009 | 0 0-10 | — |
| 2010 | 2 0-10 | — |
| 2011 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 2 0-10 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 0-10 | 0 0-10 | 0 0-10 | 5 |
| 2010s | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 2 0-10 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Eswatini
- 171 Barbados 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Czechia 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Ecuador 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Fiji 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Gambia 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Haiti 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Hungary 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Marshall Islands 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Qatar 2 0-10 compare
- 171 South Sudan 2 0-10 compare
- 171 Tanzania 2 0-10 compare
More reference data data for Eswatini
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0203 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3059 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0048 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.3309 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0679 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0557 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.66 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 1.82 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.026 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Eswatini?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index in Eswatini was 2 0-10 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Eswatini?
- The highest recorded value was 2 0-10 in 2010.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index recorded in Eswatini?
- The lowest recorded value was 0 0-10 in 2005.
- How does Eswatini rank for protecting minority investors: extent of disclosure index?
- Eswatini ranks 171st out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Where does this Eswatini data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of disclosure index (0-10). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The extent of disclosure index measures the approval and disclosure requirements of related-party transactions. It has five components: (i) whether it is the managing director alone, the board of directors, or the general meeting of shareholders the corporate body who can provide legally sufficient approval for the transaction (points are assigned depending on whether interested directors are permitted to vote or not); (ii) whether an external body (an independent auditor, for example) must review the transaction before it takes place; (iii) whether disclosure by Mr. James to the board of directors or the supervisory board is required; (iv) whether immediate disclosure of the transaction to the public, the regulator or the shareholders is required; and (v) whether disclosure in periodic filings (for example, annual reports) is required.