Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Trinidad and Tobago
Trinidad and Tobago: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 90 in 2019. ▬ Flat
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Trinidad and Tobago, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
The most recent figure for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Trinidad and Tobago is 90, measured in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
The figure is unchanged over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Trinidad and Tobago peaked at 90 in 2005 and was at its lowest, 90, in 2005.
Trinidad and Tobago ranks 4th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Trinidad and Tobago, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 90 | — |
| 2006 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2009 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 90 | +0.0% |
| 2019 | 90 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90 | 90 | 90 | 5 |
| 2010s | 90 | 90 | 90 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Trinidad and Tobago
- 1 Cambodia 100 compare
- 1 Kenya 100 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 compare
- 4 Canada 90 compare
- 4 Israel 90 compare
- 4 Kuwait 90 compare
- 4 Malaysia 90 compare
- 4 New Zealand 90 compare
- 4 North Macedonia 90 compare
- 4 Rwanda 90 compare
- 4 Saudi Arabia 90 compare
- 4 Singapore 90 compare
- 4 Slovenia 90 compare
More reference data data for Trinidad and Tobago
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.0696 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.0589 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0005 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 0.165 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.2333 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.0945 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 0.3189 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 0.7976 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.0027 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Trinidad and Tobago was 90 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The highest recorded value was 90 in 2005.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Trinidad and Tobago?
- The lowest recorded value was 90 in 2005.
- How does Trinidad and Tobago rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Trinidad and Tobago ranks 4th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index rising or falling in Trinidad and Tobago?
- Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Trinidad and Tobago data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.