Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Saudi Arabia
Saudi Arabia: Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index was 90 in 2019. ▲ Rising
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Saudi Arabia, 2005–2019
Source: World Bank.
Analysis
Saudi Arabia recorded 90 for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in 2019. That is the highest value across all 15 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 12.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Saudi Arabia peaked at 90 in 2018 and was at its lowest, 70, in 2005.
Saudi Arabia ranks 4th of 191 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index in Saudi Arabia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 70 | — |
| 2006 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2007 | 70 | +0.0% |
| 2008 | 80 | +14.3% |
| 2009 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2010 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2011 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2012 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2013 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2014 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2015 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2016 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2017 | 80 | +0.0% |
| 2018 | 90 | +12.5% |
| 2019 | 90 | +0.0% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74 | 70 | 80 | 5 |
| 2010s | 82 | 80 | 90 | 10 |
Countries ranked near Saudi Arabia
- 1 Cambodia 100 compare
- 1 Kenya 100 compare
- 1 United Arab Emirates 100 compare
- 4 Canada 90 compare
- 4 Israel 90 compare
- 4 Kuwait 90 compare
- 4 Malaysia 90 compare
- 4 New Zealand 90 compare
- 4 North Macedonia 90 compare
- 4 Rwanda 90 compare
- 4 Singapore 90 compare
- 4 Slovenia 90 compare
- 4 Trinidad and Tobago 90 compare
More reference data data for Saudi Arabia
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.1847 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 1.4 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 2.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.1771 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Indirect emissions (N2O) - Agricultural Soils 2.44 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure applied to Soils 0.6194 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure Management 0.2207 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Manure left on Pasture 6.07 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - IPCC Agriculture 10.64 (2050)
- Emission Totals - Emissions (N2O) - Crop Residues 0.9641 (2050)
Frequently asked questions
- What is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Saudi Arabia?
- Protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index in Saudi Arabia was 90 in 2019, according to the World Bank.
- What is the highest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Saudi Arabia?
- The highest recorded value was 90 in 2018.
- What is the lowest protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index recorded in Saudi Arabia?
- The lowest recorded value was 70 in 2005.
- How does Saudi Arabia rank for protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 4th out of 191 countries with data for 2019.
- Is protecting minority investors: extent of director liability index rising or falling in Saudi Arabia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 12.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Saudi Arabia data come from?
- The figures come from the World Bank, published as part of Protecting minority investors: Extent of director liability index (0-10) - Score. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
The score for extent of director liability index benchmarks economies with respect to the regulatory best practice on the indicator. The score is indicated on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 represents the worst regulatory performance and 100 the best regulatory performance.